• icon+90(535) 849 84 68
  • iconnwsa.akademi@hotmail.com
  • icon Fırat Akademi Samsun-Türkiye

> Detaylı Arama

Article Details

Article Details

  • Article Code : FIRAT-AKADEMI-13263-5766
  • Article Type : Derleme
  • Publication Number : 1A0499
  • Page Number : 96-112
  • Doi : 10.12739/NWSA.2025.20.4.1A0499
  • Abstract Reading : 251
  • Download : 53
  • Atıf Sayısı : 0
  • Share :

  • PDF Download

Issue Details

  • Year : 2025
  • Volume : 20
  • Issue : 4
  • Number of Articles Published : 6
  • Published Date : 1.10.2025

Cover Download Context Page Download
Dergi Kapağı
Engineering Sciences

Serial Number : 1A
ISSN No. : 1308-7231
Release Interval (in a Year) : 4 Issues

SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR KENTSEL DÖNÜŞÜMÜN BOYUTLARI

Habsa Abdi Farah1

Bu makalede sürdürülebilir kentsel dönüşüm olgusu on temel boyutta çok disiplinli bir yaklaşımla ele alınmıştır. Bu boyutlar ise çevresel, sosyal, ekonomik, ulaşım ve altyapı, iklim değişikliğiyle mücadele, planlama, bilimsel, fiziksel, hukuki ve biyoharmolojik boyutlar. Çalışmada literatür taraması yöntemi kullanılarak ilgili kaynaklar incelenmiş, her boyutun hem kuramsal çerçevesi hem de kentsel planlama süreçlerindeki karşılıkları değerlendirilmiştir. Sürdürülebilirlik ilkeleri doğrultusunda geliştirilen kentsel politikaların sadece çevresel koruma değil, aynı zamanda toplumsal kapsayıcılık, ekonomik dirençlilik ve kültürel devamlılık sağlaması gerektiği vurgulanmıştır. Teorik bilgi ile pratik uygulama arasındaki uyumsuzluklar, boyutlar arası entegrasyon eksikliği ve yerel önceliklendirme sorunları analiz edilmiştir. Özellikle sosyal adalet, katılımcı yönetişim ve kültürel değerlerin korunması gibi konuların göz ardı edilmesinin, dönüşüm politikalarının başarısını sınırladığı ifade edilmiştir. Çalışmanın sonucunda, sürdürülebilir kentsel dönüşümün başarılı olabilmesi için tüm boyutların entegre biçimde değerlendirilmesi ve yerel bağlama uygun, bütüncül stratejilerin benimsenmesi gerektiği sonucuna varılmıştır.

Keywords
Sürdürülebilirlik, Kentsel Dönüşüm, Çok Boyutlu Analiz, Çevresel Planlama, Biyoharmoloji,

DIMENSIONS OF SUSTAINABLE URBAN TRANSFORMATION

Habsa Abdi Farah1

This article examines the phenomenon of sustainable urban transformation through a multidisciplinary approach, focusing on ten key dimensions: environmental, social, economic, transportation and infrastructure, climate change adaptation, planning, scientific, physical, legal, and bioharmological aspects. Using a literature review methodology, relevant sources were examined, and both the theoretical frameworks of each dimension and their practical implications in urban planning processes were evaluated. The study emphasizes that urban policies developed in line with sustainability principles should not only ensure environmental protection but also social inclusivity, economic resilience, and cultural continuity. The analysis identifies discrepancies between theoretical knowledge and practical implementation, deficiencies in integration among dimensions, and challenges in local prioritization. Specifically, it highlights how neglecting issues such as social justice, participatory governance, and the preservation of cultural values limits the success of transformation policies. The study concludes that for sustainable urban transformation to succeed, all dimensions must be evaluated in an integrated manner, and context-specific, holistic strategies should be adopted.

Keywords
Sustainability, Urban Transformation, Multidimensional Analysis, Environmental Planning, Bioharmology,

Details
   

Authors

Habsa Abdi Farah (1) (Corresponding Author)
Öğrenci
habsa.abdi.farah@gmail.com | 0009-0000-6301-3966

Supporting Institution

 :

Project Number

 :

Thanks

 :
References
1. Erdogan, G. ve Öztürk, B., (2019). Sürdürülebilir kentlesme: dokuma kenti Buldan Örnegi. Mimarlik Bilimleri ve Uygulamalari Dergisi (MBUD), 4(1).

2. Dinçer, Ö., (2016). Sürdürülebilir kentlesme tartismalari ve kent hakki. Ufuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(10).

3. Akkaya, A., (2023). Sürdürülebilir kentlesme modellerinin üretilmesinde dirençli kent insaasi. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Konya: Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.

4. Jabareen, Y.R., (2006). Sustainable urban forms: Their typologies, models, and concepts. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26(1):38–52.

5. United Nations Human Settlements Programme, (2009). Planning sustainable cities: Global report on human settlements 2009. Earthscan.

6. Tunçer, P., (2016). Sürdürülebilir kentlesme politikalari ve Türkiye, Turkish studies – international periodical for the languages, literature and history of Turkish or Turkic, 11(2).

7. World Commission on Environment and Development, (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press.

8. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, (2019). World urbanization prospects: The 2018 revision. United Nations.

9. Aydemir, A. and Demirtas-Milz, N., (2022). Sustainable urban development and green infrastructure in Istanbul. In C. Güzey (Ed.), Sustainable Cities and Communities in Turkey (pp:233–249). Springer.

10. Mentese, S., (2017). Çevresel sürdürülebilirlik açisindan toprak, su ve hava kirliligi: Teorik bir inceleme. Uluslararasi Sosyal Arastirmalar Dergisi, 10(53):382–390.

11. Susmaz, H. ve Ekinci, C.E., (2009). Saglikli kentlesme süreci esaslari. E-Journal New World Sciences Academy, 4(1):21–34. https://doi.org/10.12739/10.12739.

12. Geçer, E., Sentürk, I. ve Büyükgüngör, H., (2019). Yesil bina tasariminda su ve enerji yönetimi üzerine uygulama örnegi. Gümüshane Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(2):332–343.

13. Kaya, M. ve Kaya, D., (2020). Sosyal, ekonomik ve çevresel boyutlarla sürdürülebilirlik ve sürdürülebilir kalkinma. Uluslararasi Ekonomi ve Yenilik Dergisi, 6(2):241–255.

14. Savas, H. ve Kömürlüg, R., (2022). LEED v2009 kapsaminda malzeme ve kaynaklar kategorisinin degerlendirilmesi: Kocaeli örnegi. Mimarlik ve Yasam Dergisi, 7(3):981–994.

15. Gómez, F., Jabaloyes, J., Montero, L., De Vicente, V., and Valcuende, M., (2011). Green areas, the most significant indicator of the sustainability of cities: Research on their utility for urban planning. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 137(3):311–328.

16. Xie, M., Gao, Y., Cao, Y., Breuste, J., Fu, M., and Tong, D., (2015). Dynamics and temperature regulation function of urban green connectivity. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 141(3).

17. Chang, Q., Liu, X., Wu, J., and He, P., (2015). MSPA-based urban green infrastructure planning and management approach for urban sustainability: Case study of Longgang in China. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 141(3).

18. Baycan-Levent, T. and Nijkamp, P., (2009). Planning and management of urban green spaces in Europe: Comparative analysis. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 135(1):1–12.

19. Jalalianhosseini, H., Afsari Bajestani, S., McCarthy, L., and Jalalianhosseini, M., (2021). Transformation of urban spaces within cities in the context of globalization and urban competitiveness. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 147(3).

20. Cortese, T.T.P., de Almeida, J.F.S., Batista, G.Q., Storopoli, J.E., Liu, A., and Yigitcanlar, T., (2022). Understanding sustainable energy in the context of smart cities: A Prisma review. Energies, 15:2382.

21. Akbari, P. and Bafarasat, A.Z., (2024). Exploring energy efficiency in historical urban fabrics for energy-conscious planning of new urban developments. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 150(2). Doi:10.1061/JUPDDM.UPENG-4652.

22. Ounis, S., (2022). Étude et évaluation des différentes techniques d’efficacité énergétique dans les bâtiments intelligents (Mémoire de master, Université de Tunis).

23. Amasuomo, E. and Baird, J., (2016). The concept of waste and waste management. Journal of Management and Sustainability, 6(4):88–96.

24. Elsaid, S. and Aghezzaf, E.H., (2014). A framework for sustainable waste management: challenges and opportunities. Ghent University, Belgium. Management Research Review, 38(10):1086-1097.

25. Akbas, A. ve Çaliskan, Ö., (2023). Insaat sektöründe sürdürülebilirlik ve atik yönetimi. Bilecik Seyh Edebali Üniversitesi, Bildiri. [Conference paper]

26. Wan, C., Shen, G.Q., and Choi, S., (2019). Waste management strategies for sustainable development. In W. Leal Filho (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education. Springer.

27. Doru, S. ve Atis, E., (2025). Çiftçilerin tarimsal plastik atiklara yönelik tutumlarinin çevresel sürdürülebilirlik açisindan incelenmesi. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 62(1):87–100.

28. Morales, M.P., Juárez, M.C., Muñoz, P., and Mendívil, M.A., (2016). Energy efficiency in buildings: Study of single-leaf walls made with clay bricks. Energy and Buildings, 142(1).

29. Kadir, K., (2014). La transformation de l’espace urbain au prisme de la notion de durabilité [Thèse de doctorat, Université Paul Valéry - Montpellier III]. HAL.

30. Ghahremani, H., Afsari Bajestani, S., McCarthy, L., and Jalalianhosseini, M., (2021). Transformation of urban spaces within cities in the context of globalization and urban competitiveness. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 147(3).

31. Demir, H. And Yilmaz, A., (2012). Measurement of urban transformation project success using the analytic hierarchy process: Sulukule and Tepeüstü-Ayazma case studies, Istanbul. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 138(2):173–182.

32. Meerow, S., Pajouhesh, P., and Miller, T.R., (2019). Social equity in urban resilience planning. Local Environment, 24(9):793–808.

33. Gün, A., Pak, B., and Demir, Y., (2021). Responding to the urban transformation challenges in Turkey: A participatory design model for Istanbul. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 13(1):32–55.

34. Medeiros, E., (2022). Urban participatory planning approaches in capital cities: The Lisbon case. European Planning Studies, 30(6):1144–1161.

35. Duxbury, N., Hosagrahar, J., and Pascual, J., (2016). Why must culture be at the heart of sustainable urban development? United Cities and Local Governments (UCLG), Agenda 21 for Culture.

36. Castán Broto, V., Trencher, G., Iwaszuk, E., and Westman, L., (2019). Transformative capacity and local action for urban sustainability. Ambio, 48:449–462.

37. McDowell, S., (2008). Heritage, memory and identity. In B. Graham & P. Howard (Eds.), The Ashgate Research Companion to Heritage and Identity (pp:37–54). Ashgate. ISBN: 978075464955.

38. Duxbury, N., (2014). Cultural governance in sustainable cities. kult-ur revista interdisciplinària sobre la cultura de la ciutat, 1(1):165–182. DOI: 10.6035/Kult-ur.2014.1.1.8

39. Gugu, S. and Dal Molin, M., (2016). Collaborative local cultural governance: What works? The case of cultural districts in Italy. Administration & Society, 48(2):237–262.

40. Marx, L., (2019). Participation as policy in local cultural governance. Cultural Trends, 28(4):294-304.

41. Opoku, A. and Akotia, J., (2020). Urban regeneration for sustainable development. Construction Economics and Building, 20(2):1–5.

42. Sepe, M., (2014). Urban transformation, socio-economic regeneration and participation: Two cases of creative urban regeneration. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 6(1):20–41.

43. Pendlebury, J. and Porfyriou, H., (2017). Heritage, urban regeneration and place-making. Journal of Urban Design, 22(4):429–432.

44. Bolger, K. and Doyon, A., (2019). Circular cities: Exploring local government strategies to facilitate a circular economy. European Planning Studies, 27(11):2184–2205.

45. Mikelsone, E., Atstaja, D., Koval, V., et al., (2021). Exploring sustainable urban transformation concepts for economic development. Economía, Empresa y Finanzas, 39(5).

46. Derrible, S., (2019). An approach to designing sustainable urban infrastructure. MRS Energy & Sustainability, 5, e15.

47. Pandit, A., et al., (2015). Infrastructure ecology: An evolving paradigm for sustainable urban development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 122:373–384.

48. Bonilla, M. and Zapparoli, I., (2017). The Challenge of Financing Urban Infrastructure for Sustainable Cities. Inter-American Development Bank. IDB-MG-527.

49. Aarhaug, J. and Gundersen, F., (2017). Infrastructure investments to promote sustainable regions. Transportation Research Procedia, 26:187–195.

50. Du, H., et al., (2019). Research development on sustainable urban infrastructure from 1991 to 2017: A bibliometric analysis. Earth’s Future, 7(7):718–733.

51. Floater, G., et al., (2017). Global review of finance for sustainable urban infrastructure. Coalition for Urban Transitions.

52. Waisman, H., Guivarch, C., and Lecocq, F., (2013). The transportation sector and low-carbon growth pathways: Modelling urban, infrastructure and spatial determinants of mobility. Climate Policy, 13(S1):106–129.

53. Drummond, P., (2021). Evaluating municipal governance for low-carbon mobility transitions in London. Sustainability, 13, 2480.

54. Hook, W., Lotshaw, S., and Weinstock, A., (2010). Carbon dioxide reduction benefits of bus rapid transit systems: Learning from Bogotá, Colombia; Mexico City, Mexico; and Jakarta, Indonesia. New York: Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (ITDP).

55. Antipova, A., Wang, J., and Wilmot, C.G., (2020). Transportation accessibility and equity: A review for urban sustainability. Sustainability, 12(9):3611. ttps://doi.org/10.3390/su12093611

56. Dumbaugh, E. and Li, W., (2010). Designing for the safety of pedestrians, cyclists, and motorists in urban environments. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(1):69–83.

57. Kahn, M.E., (2016). The climate change adaptation literature. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 10(1):13–34.

58. Larsen, L., (2015). Urban climate and adaptation strategies. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 13(9):486–492.

59. McNamara, K.E. and Buggy, L., (2017). Community-based climate change adaptation: A review of academic literature. Local Environment, 22(4):443–460.

60. Da Silva, J., Kernaghan, S., and Luque, A., (2012). A systems approach to meeting the challenges of urban climate change. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 4(2):125–145.

61. Berrang-Ford, L., Pearce, T., and Ford, J.D., (2015). Systematic approaches to reviewing climate change adaptation practices. Regional Environmental Change, 15(5):755–769.

62. Han, T., Zhang, Y., Qian, J., and Liu, J., (2023). A comparative review of urban heat island mitigation strategies in China. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 28, 60.

63. Osaka, S., Bellamy, R., and Castree, N., (2021). Framing “nature-based” solutions to climate change. WIREs Climate Change, 12(5):e729.

64. Seddon, N., Smith, A., Smith, P., Key, I., Chausson, A., and Girardin, C., (2021). Getting the message right on nature-based solutions to climate change. Global Change Biology, 27(8):1518–1546.

65. Kabisch, N., Strohbach, M., Haase, D., and Kronenberg, J., (2016). Urban green space availability in European cities. Ecological Indicators, 70:586–596.

66. Griffiths, J., Shen, L., and Wang, J., (2020). Interpretation and application of Sponge City guidelines in China. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 378(2183):20190222.

67. Lesnikowski, A., Biesbroek, R., Ford, J.D., and Berrang-Ford, L., (2021). Policy implementation styles and local governments: The case of climate change adaptation. Environmental Politics, 30(5):753–790.

68. Ekinci, C.E. ve Elyigit, B., (2021), Kentsel Dönüsüm. Ankara: Data Yayinlari, ISBN: 978-625-8469-80-6.

69. Hafsi, F.Z., (2021). Impact de la morphologie de la ville sur le développement urbain durable : Cas de la ville de Souk Ahras (Thèse de doctorat, Université Salah Boubnider – Constantine 3).

70. Sikuzani, Y.K., Kabala, B.C., M’baya, M.L., & Fundi, B., (2018). Caractérisation de la croissance spatiale urbaine de la ville de Lubumbashi (RDC). Bulletin de la Société Géographique de Liège, 36(1):99–113.

71. Boukelouha, M. and Belkacem, S., (2019). Définir la marchabilité par la morphologie urbaine ? Une revue de littérature. Nature Sciences Société, 27(3):295–306.

72. Bioteau, E. and Prugneau, A., (2014). Résidences démontables et résidences mobiles : les enjeux de la loi ALUR pour l’habitat léger. Droit et Ville, (78):59–74.

73. Gherzouli, L., (2020). Évaluation de l’intégration de la durabilité dans les documents d’urbanisme: Cas des PDAU et PUD d’Algérie (Thèse de doctorat, Université de Batna 1).

74. Dionnet, M. and Guérin-Schneider, L., (2014). La coordination inter-organisationnelle, levier de la gouvernance territoriale ? Géographie, Économie, Société, 16(1):81–104.

75. Rey-Valette, H., Roussel, S., and Thévenet, C., (2014). Comment analyser la gouvernance territoriale ? Mise à l’épreuve d’une grille de lecture. Géographie, Économie, Société, 16(1):25–46.

76. Samb, M., (2014). Gouvernance territoriale et participation citoyenne au Sénégal : Analyse à partir des collectivités locales rurales de la région de Dakar (Thèse de doctorat, Université Cheikh Anta Diop de Dakar).

77. Amir, A., (2015). La planification urbaine à travers les instruments d’urbanisme et la démarche prospective (Mémoire de magister, Université de Constantine 3).

78. Motib, M. and Faath, R., (2020). Limites des “documents d’urbanisme” comme instruments de la planification urbaine dans l’amélioration du fonctionnement des villes marocaines. Mémoire de master, Université Mohammed V – Rabat.

79. Elyigit, B. and Ekinci, C.E., (2024). Investigation of urban transformation process, methods, and techniques: Elazig province sample. Firat Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 36(1):153–163.

80. Uyanik, D. ve Altin, M., (2022). Konut mekân tasariminda renk ve aydinlatma sisteminin kullanici konforuna etkileri. Sanat ve Tasarim Dergisi, 22(1):87–102.

81. Elyigit, B. ve Ekinci, C.E., (2023). Betonarme yapilarda yapisal ve yapisal olmayan hasarlar ve hasar tespiti üzerine bir arastirma, Engineering Sciences, 18(2):19-42, DOI: 10.12739/NWSA.2023.18.2.1A0485.

82. Erten, S., (2020). Çevre tasarimi ve insan. [Makale dosyasi]. ResearchGate.

83. Elyigit, B., (2013). Alisveris Merkezlerinin Mekânsal Niteliklerinin Biyoharmoloji Açisindan Incelenmesi (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Elazig: Firat Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.

84. Ghedira, A., (2015). Planification urbaine et développement durable en Tunisie: vers une nouvelle conception territoriale. HAL Archives ouvertes.

85. Gherzouli, L., (2014). Développement durable, aménagement du territoire et gouvernance en Algérie: vers une stratégie territoriale intégrée. Développement durable et territoires, 5(3).

86. Douay, N., (2013). La planification urbaine française : théories, normes juridiques et défis pour la pratique. Métropoles, 13.

87. Karibi, A., (2022). Urbanisme et développement durable : une nouvelle vision de la fabrique urbaine. Afrique de l’Ouest – AMJAU, 2(2):13–26.

88. Islam, M.S., Chen, Y., Bouferguene, A., and Al-Hussein, M., (2019). Rethinking urban open-space distribution for municipal financial sustainability. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 33(3).

89. Kabisch, N., Korn, H., Stadler, J., and Bonn, A., (2016). Nature-based solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas: Perspectives, opportunities, and challenges. Ecology and Society, 21(2):39.

90. Ekinci, C.E. and Elyigit, B., (2025). a new method in certification of buildings: BCA method and a case study. Sustainability, 17(15):6986. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17156986.