• icon+90(535) 849 84 68
  • iconnwsa.akademi@hotmail.com
  • icon Fırat Akademi Samsun-Türkiye

> Detaylı Arama

Article Details

Article Details

  • Article Code : FIRAT-AKADEMI-8059-5657
  • Article Type : Araştırma Makalesi
  • Publication Number : 5A0209
  • Page Number : 43-54
  • Doi : 10.12739/NWSA.2024.19.1.5A0209
  • Abstract Reading : 2298
  • Download : 234
  • Atıf Sayısı : 1
  • Share :

  • PDF Download

Issue Details

  • Year : 2024
  • Volume : 19
  • Issue : 1
  • Number of Articles Published : 5
  • Published Date : 1.01.2024

Cover Download Context Page Download
Dergi Kapağı
Ecological Life Sciences

Serial Number : 5A
ISSN No. : 1308-7258
Release Interval (in a Year) : 4 Issues

Nizam Kaya1 , Tuncay ATEŞŞAHİN2 , Orhan Fulin3

Keywords

OBSERVATIONS ON HABITAT PREFERENCES OF CRAYFISH SPECIES Pontastacus leptodactylus

Nizam Kaya1 , Tuncay ATEŞŞAHİN2 , Orhan Fulin3

This study, conducted between 2016 and 2023, utilized photographs, videos taken during scuba diving, and expert opinions to provide a comprehensive overview of each period. Despite Pontastacus leptodactylus not being a native species of Keban Dam Lake, it has adapted to the environment over the years and has become economically important for fishing. This article aimed to identify various shelter types used by this crayfish species in Keban Dam Lake. It has been observed that crayfish in Keban Dam Lake utilize a wide range of shelters, including natural rocks, crevices, and even discarded objects such as submerged plastic bottles. The sizes of these shelters vary, ranging from 10 to 15 cm in diameter, and depths range from 20 to 40 cm. Therefore, it is recommended to conduct experimental studies in natural environments to explore the use of shelter types in natural habitats.

Keywords
Shelter type, Pontastacus leptodactylus, Keban Dam Lake, Habitat Preferences, Diving,

Details
   

Authors

Nizam Kaya (1)

Fırat Üniversitesi
nizamkaya@gmail.com | 0000-0003-4543-7292

Tuncay ATEŞŞAHİN (2) (Corresponding Author)
Fırat University
tatessahin@firat.edu.tr | 0000-0001-9168-5444

Orhan Fulin (3)

Fırat Üniversitesi
orhanfulin@gmail.com | 0000-1111-1122-3333

Supporting Institution

 :

Project Number

 :

Thanks

 :
References
1. Erençin, Z. and Köksal, G., (1977). Studies on the Freshwater Crayfish (Astacus leptodactylus Esch., 1823) in Anatolia, Freshwater Crayfish, 3, 187-192.

2. Bolat, Y., (2001). Egirdir Gölü Hoyran Bölgesi Tatlı Su İstakozlarının (Astacus leptodactylus salinus Nordmann, 1842) populasyon büyüklügünün tahmini (Doktora Tezi). Isparta: Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.

3. Cìlbìz, M., (2020). Pleopodal fecundity of narrow-clawed crayfish (Pontastacus leptodactylus Eschscholtz, 1823). Invertebrate Reproduction & Development, 64(3):208-218.

4. Cilbiz, M.. (2021). Effect of some biotic and abiotic factors on hard and soft-shell of crayfish (Pontastacus leptodactylus Eschscholtz, 1823): a case study from Hirfanlı Dam Lake. Acta Aquatica Turcica, 17(4):548-555.

5. Cilbiz, M., Aydın, C., and Uzunmehmetoğlu, O.Y., (2020). Evaluation of Turkey's crayfish (Pontastacus leptodactylus (Eschscholtz, 1823) Production in National and Global Scale.

6. Zaikov, A., Piskov, I., and Iliev, I., (2010). Investigation on shelter competition between narrow-clawed crayfish Astacus leptodactylus (Esch.) and noble crayfish Astacus astacus L. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 16(3):369-375.

7. Dartay, M. and Ateşşahin, T., (2013). A study on catching freshwater crayfish, Astacus leptodactylus Eschscholtz 1823, and its some population characteristics. Turkish Journal of Science & Technology, 8(2):125-130.

8. Demirol, F. ve Yüksel, F., (2013). Keban Baraj Gölü kerevit avcılığının sosyo-ekonomik yapısı. Bilim ve Gençlik Dergisi, 1(2):13-23.

9. Demirol, F. ve Yüksel, F., (2014). Keban Baraj Gölündeki kerevit (Astacus leptodactylus eschscholtz, 1823) populasyonuna uygulanan avcılık tekniğinin belirlenmesi. Aquaculture Studies, 2014(1):13-22.

10. Mazlum, Y. ve Uzun, C., (2008). Korunak tiplerinin Astacus leptodactylus (Eschscholtz, 1823) kerevitlerinin büyümesi, hayatta kalması ve yem değerlendirmesi üzerine etkileri.

11. Griffiths, S.P., (2002). Retention of visible implant tags in small rockpool fishes. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 236:307-309.

12. Harlıoğlu, M.M. ve Aksu, Ö., (2002). Kerevitlerin (Astacus leptodactylus Eschscholtz, 1823) barınak kullanımında eşeyin, birey büyüklüğünün ve barınak büyüklüğünün önemi. Su Ürünleri Dergisi, 19(3).

13. Groza, M.I., Pop-Vancia, V., and Mireşan, V., (2016). Diel activity and use of multiple artificially constructed shelters in Astacus leptodactylus (Decapoda: Astacidae). Biologia, 71(12):1369-1379.

14. Gonza´lez, R., Celada, J.D., Garcia, V., Carral, J.M., and Sa´ez-Royuela, M., (2010). Stocking density for the intensive rearing of juvenile crayfish, Pacifastacus leniusculus (Astacidae), using Artemia nauplii to supplement a dry diet from the onset of exogenous feeding. Aquacult International, 18:371-378.

15. Ramalho, R.O., Correia, A.M., and Anastacio, P.M., (2008). Effects of density on growth and survival of juvenile Red Swamp Crayfish, Procambarus clarkii (Girard), reared under laboratory conditions. Aquaculture Research, 39:577-586.

16. Harlıoglu, M.M., (2009). A comparison of the growth and survival of two freshwater crayfish species, Astacus leptodactylus Eschscholtz and Pacifastacus leniusculus (Dana), under different temperature and density regimes. Aquaculture Inernational, 17:31-43.

17. Demirol, F., Gündüz, F., Yüksel, F., Çoban, M., Abdulmutalip, B.E.R.İ., Kurtoğlu, M., ... and Küçükyılmaz, M., (2015). Keban Baraj Gölü Kerevit (Astacus leptodactylus Eschscholtz, 1823) avcılığında hedef dışı ve ıskarta av oranlarının belirlenmesi. Journal of Limnology and Freshwater Fisheries Research, 1(2):69-74.

18. Fero, K.C. and Moore, P.A., (2014). Shelter availability influences social behavior and habitat choice in crayfish, Orconectes virilis. Behaviour, 151(1):103–123.

19. DOI: 10.1163/1568539X-00003125.

20. Garvey, J.E., Stein, R.A., and Thomas, H.M., (1994). Assessing how fish predation and interspecific prey competition influence a crayfish assemblage. Ecology, 75(2):532–547. DOI: 10.2307/1939556.

21. Loughman, Z.J., Skalican, K.T., and Taylor, N.D., (2013). Habitat selection and movement of Cambarus chasmodactylus (Decapoda: Cambaridae) assessed via radio telemetry. Freshwater Science, 32(4):1288–1297. DOI: 10.1899/12-166.1

22. Lynas, J., Storey, A.W., and Knott, B., (2007). Aggressive interactions between three species of freshwater crayfish of the genu Cherax (Decapoda: Parastacidae). Marine and Freshwater Behaviour and Physiology, 40(2):105–116. DOI: 10.1080/10236240701245539.

23. Robinson, C.A., Thom, T.J., and Lucas, M.C., (2000). Ranging behaviour of a large freshwater invertebrate, the white-clawed crayfish Austropotamobius pallipes. Freshwater Biology, 44(3):509–521. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2000. 00603.x