Authors |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Supporting Institution |
: | |||||||
|
||||||||
Project Number |
: | |||||||
|
||||||||
Thanks |
: |
Cover Download | Context Page Download |
Mohammed ZERF1 , Wahib BEBOUCHA2
Similar studies show that trainers must integrate strategies in their tactical lessons. Leading players to explore their tactics in a group of learners founded on their intelligence assimilated by simulation or multi visual intelligence (VMI) as new approach used and develops by American and European teams. However, in our teams the most approach used by our trainers, especially in tactical sessions stands for direct instruction (DI). From this technical point of view, the present study aimed to decide which approached can emphases the tactical performance in youth soccer players. To archive this proposal, 36 federated male soccer players aged under 16 and 17 years. Participate in this experiment, 18 of them base their tactical sessions on multi visual intelligence (VMI), where the others are exposed to direct instruction (DI). Build on design of study and statistical applied, our results advocate that performance in tactical situations be in flavors of players exposed to VMI compared to those taught using DI. Owing to motor space using visual tactical feedback as a remained strategy of combining collective tactics. Needing from player, the control of the gaze and attention over multiple visuomotor workspaces. As well as quantitative and qualitative aspects of performance decision-makers, as respond individually or cooperative during the soccer game.
Keywords
Multiple Visual Intelligence,
Direct Instruction,
Tactical Performance,
Soccer Players,
Youth,
Authors |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Supporting Institution |
: | |||||||
|
||||||||
Project Number |
: | |||||||
|
||||||||
Thanks |
: |