• icon+90(533) 652 66 86
  • iconnwsa.akademi@hotmail.com
  • icon Fırat Akademi Samsun-Türkiye

Article Details

  • Article Code : FIRAT-AKADEMI-9250-5551
  • Article Type : Araştırma Makalesi
  • Publication Number : 5A0186
  • Page Number : 257-267
  • Doi : 10.12739/NWSA.2022.17.4.5A0186
  • Abstract Reading : 519
  • Download : 116
  • Share :

  • PDF Download

Issue Details

  • Year : 2022
  • Volume : 17
  • Issue : 4
  • Number of Articles Published : 15
  • Published Date : 1.10.2022

Cover Download Context Page Download
Ecological Life Sciences

Serial Number : 5A
ISSN No. : 1308-7258
Release Interval (in a Year) : 4 Issues

DİKENLİ TATLISU YILAN BALIĞI (Mastacembalus mastacembalus, Bank ve Solander, 1794)’IN SOLUNGAÇLARININ HİSTOLOJİK YAPISI VE BAZI HİSTOKİMYASAL ÖZELLİKLERİ

Hatice Eda DABAK1 , SİBEL KÖPRÜCÜ2

Çalışmada; Elazığ Keban Baraj Gölü’nden temin edilen 5 adet Dikenli Tatlısu Yılan Balığı (Mastacembalus mastacembalus, Bank ve Solander, 1794)’nın solungaçlarının histolojik ve histokimyasal özellikleri ışık mikroskobunda incelendi. Mastacembalus mastacembalus’un solungaçları primer filament ve sekonder lamelları olan her biri iki hemibranştan oluşan dört holobranştan şekillenmiştir. Solungaç filamentleri afferent ve efferent arterlerle vaskularizedir. Filament ve lamellada, plaster, klorid ve mukus hücreleri bulunmaktadır. Klorid hücreleri az sayıda olup, primer filamentte yer almaktadır. Mukus hücreleri, primer filamentte ve sekonder lamellanın tabanında bol miktarda görülmektedir. Solungaçlarda yapılan histokimyasal boyamalar sonucunda mukus hücrelerindeki glikokonjugatlar; güçlü sülfatlı (AB pH 0.4) negatif, O-esterli (AB pH 1.0) pozitif, asidik (AB pH 2.5) kuvvetli pozitif, nötral (PAS) pozitif, nötral ve asidik (PAS/AB pH 2.5) asidik baskın, sülfatlı (AF) negatif, sülfatlı asidik (AF/AB pH 2.5) asidik baskın, siyalik asit rezidülü (saponifikasyon) (KOH/PAS) negatif reaksiyon gösterdi.

Keywords
Mastacembalus mastacembalus, Solungaç, Histoloji, Yapı, Histokimya,

INVESTIGATION OF HISTOLOGY STRUCTURE AND SOME HISTOCHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF GILLS IN THE SPINY EEL, (Mastacembalus mastacembalus, Bank and Bolander, 1794)

Hatice Eda DABAK1 , SİBEL KÖPRÜCÜ2

In this study, the histological structure and histochemical characteristics of gills of five spiny eel, (Mastacembalus mastacembalus, Bank and Solander, 1794)’s gills obtained in Keban Dam lake were examined in the light microscope. The gills of Mastacembalus mastacembalus are formed by four holobranchs, each consisting of two hemibranchs with primary filaments and secondary lamellae. The gill filaments are vascularized by afferent and efferent arteries. The filament and lamellae contain plaster, chloride and mucous cells. Chlorid cells are scarce in the primary filaments. Mucous cells are observed abundant on the primary filament and secondary lamellae. As a result of histochemically staining of the gills of Mastacembalus mastacembalus were determined that mucous cells included strong sulphate (AB pH 0.4), O-sulphate esters (AB pH 1.0), acidic (AB pH 2.5), neutral (PAS), neutral and acid rich (PAS/AB pH 2.5). Mucous cells containing sulphate and acidic (AF/AB pH 2.5) showed dominant acid reaction. Mucous cells including sulphate (AF) and sialic acid recidues (KOH/PAS) were seen negative reaction.

Keywords
Mastacembalus mastacembalus, Gill, Histology, Structure, Histochemistry,

Details
   

Authors

Hatice Eda DABAK (1)

edadabak@firat.edu.tr | 0000-0002-4142-2221

SİBEL KÖPRÜCÜ (2) (Corresponding Author)

FIRAT ÜNIVERSITESI
skoprucu@firat.edu.tr | 0000-0002-6565-3550

Supporting Institution

: Araştırma Fırat Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Birimine [INJ]SÜF.15.01 nolu proje[INJ]tarafından desteklenmiştir.

Project Number

: SÜF.15.01 nolu proje

Thanks

: Yazarlar araştırmayı “SÜF.15.01 nolu proje” ile destekleyen “Fırat Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Birimine” teşekkür eder.
References
[1] Coad, B.W. and Keivany, Y., (2002). Book review: “Atlas of Iranian fishes: Gilan inland waters”, “The inland freshwater fishes of Iran”, “A guide to the fauna of Iran”, and “Freshwater fishes of Iran”. Copeia, (4):1165-1166.

[2] Jalali, B., Barzegar, M., and Nezamabadi, H., (2008). Parasitic fauna of spiny eel Mastacembalus mastacembalus Banks&Solander (Teleostei: Mastacembelidae) in Iran. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Research, Shiraz University, 9(2):23.

[3] Kuru, M., (1975). Dicle–Fırat, Kura–Aras, Van Gölü ve Karadeniz Havzası Tatlı Sularında Yaşayan Balıkların (Pisces) Sistematik ve Zoocoğrafik Yönden İncelenmesi. Doçentlik Tezi, Atatürk Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi.

[4] Coad, B.W., (1996). Zoogeography of the fishes of the Tigris-Euphrates basin. Zoology in the Middle East., 13:51-70.

[5] Ekingen, G. ve Sarieyyüpoğlu, M., (1981). Keban Baraj Gölü Balıkları. Fırat Üniver. Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(1-3):7–22.

[6] Erdemli, A.Ü. ve Kalkan, E., (1996). Tohma Çayı balıkları üzerinde faunistik bir çalışma. Doğa Türk Zooloji Dergisi, 20:153-160.

[7] Karadede, H., Cengiz, E.İ. ve Ünlü, E., (1997). Atatürk Baraj Gölü’ndeki Mastacembelus simack (Walbaum, 1792)’ta ağır metal birikiminin incelenmesi. IX. Ulusal Su Ürünleri Sempozyumu, Isparta, ss:399-407.

[8] Kılıç, H.M., (2002) Sultansuyu Deresi, Beyler Deresi ve Karakaya Barajında Yaşayan Mastacembelus simack’ın Biyolojik Özelliklerinin İncelenmesi (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Eskişehir: Osmangazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.

[9] Pazira A., Abdoli A., Kouhgardie., and Yousefifard, P., (2005). Age Structure and growth of the Mesopotamian Spiny Eel, Mastacembelus mastacembelus (Banks&Solender in russell, 1974) (Mastacembelidae), in southern Iran. Zoology in the Middle East, 35:43-47.

[10] Gümüş, A., Şahinöz, E., Doğu, Z., and Polat, N., (2010). Age and growth of the Mesopotamian spiny eel, Mastacembelus mastacembelus (Banks & Solender, 1794), from southeastern Anatolia. Turkish Journal Zoology, 34:399-407.

[11] Eroğlu, M. and Şen, D., (2009). Otolith Size-Total Length Relationship In Spiny Eel, Mastacembelus mastacembelus (Banks& Solander, 1794). Inhabiting in Karakaya Dam Lake (Malatya, Turkey). Journal of Fisheries Sciences, 3(4):342-351.

[12] Oymak, S.A., Kırankaya, Ş.G., and Doğan, N., (2009). Growth and reproduction of Mesopotamian spiny eel (Mastacembalus mastacembalus Banks and Solander, 1794) in Ataturk Dam Lake (Şanlıurfa), Turkey. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 25(4):488-490.

[13] Çakmak, E. and Alp, A., (2010). Morphological Differences Among the Mesopotamian Spiny Eel, Mastacembalus mastacembalus (Banks & Solander 1794), Populations. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 10:87-92.

[14] Kara, C., Güneş, H., Gürlek, M.E. ve Alp, A., (2014). Adıyaman Bölgesi Akarsularında Dikenli Yılan Balığı (Mastacembalus mastacembalus, Banks&Solander, 1794)nın Dağılımı ve Bazı Morfometrik Özellikleri. Yunus Araştırma Bülteni, (3):3-11.

[15] Şahinöz, E., Doğu, Z., and Aral, F., (2006a). Development of embriyos in Mastacembalus mastacembalus (Bank&Solender, 1794) (Mesopotamian spiny eel) (Mastacembelidae). Aquaculture Research, 37(16):1611-1616.

[16] Şahinöz, E., Doğu, Z., and Aral, F., (2006b). Changes in Mesopotamian spiny eel, Mastacembalus mastacembalus (Bank&Solender, in Russell, 1794) (Mastacembelidae) milt quality during a spawning period. Theriogenolgy, 67:848-854.

[17] Bashe, S.K.R. and Abdullah, S.M.A., (2010). Parasitic fauna of spiny eel Mastacembalus mastacembalus from Greater Zab river in Iraq. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Research, 11(1):18-27.

[18] Olgunoğlu, İ.A., (2011a). Determination of the fundamental nutritional components in fresh and hot smoked spiny eel (Mastacembalus mastacembalus, Bank and Solander, 1794) Scientific Research and Essays, 6(31):6448-6453.

[19] Olgunoğlu, İ.A., (2011b). Dikenli Yılan Balığı (Mastacembalus mastacembalus, Bank&Solender 1794)’nın Sıcak Tütsüleme Sonrası Aminoasit ve Organoleptik Kalitesi. Harran Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi, 15(4):23-30

[20] Dauod, H.A.M., Al-Nakeb, G.D., and Al-Hameed, R.A., (2011). Histological structure of the integument in Mastacembalus mastacembalus (Solander). Journal of Baghdad for Science Table of Content, 8(1):13-22.

[21] Luna L.G., (1968). Manual of histologic staining methods of the armed forces institute of pathology. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.

[22] Crossman, G., (1937). Modification of Mallory’s connective tissue stain with a discussion of the principles involved. Anat. Rec., 69:33-38.

[23] Gomari, G., (1952). Gomari’s aldehyde fuchsin stain, CFA Culling, RT Allison, WT Barr, In: Cellular Pathology Tecnique Butterworths, London.

[24] Spicer, S.S. and Mayer, D.R., (1960). Aldehyde fuchsin/Alcian blue. CFA Culling, RT Allison, WT Barr, In: Cellular Pathology Tecnique Butterworths, London.

[25] Culling, C.F.A., Reid, P.E., and Dunn, W.L., (1976). A new histochemical method for the identification and visualization of both side chain acylated and nonacylated sialic acids. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, 24:1225–1230.

[26] Burkhardt Holm, P., (1997). Lectin histochemistry of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) gill and skin. Histochemical Journal, 29:893-899.

[27] Diler, D. and Çınar, K., (2010). Aphanius anatoliae sureyanus (Neu, 1937) (Osteichthyes:Cyprinodontidae) solungaç glikokonjugatlarının histokimyasal özellikleri. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 1:1-8.

[28] Şenol, N., (2014). Identification of Glycoproteins in Mucous Cells of Epidermis and Gill of Tinca tinca Linnaeus, 1758 (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae). Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(2):47–49.

[29] Diaz, A.O., Garcia, A.M., Devincenti, C.V., and Goldemberg, A.L., (2001). Mucous cells in Micropogonias furnieri gills: Histochemistry and ultrastructure. Anatomia Histologia Embryologia, 30:135-139.

[30] Diaz, A.O., Garcia, A.M., Devincenti, C.V., and Goldemberg, A.L., (2005). Ultrastructure and histochemical study of glycoconjugates in the gills of the White Croaker (Micropogonias furnieri). Anatomia Histologia Embriyologia, 34:117-122.

[31] Arellano, J.M., Storch, V., and Sarasquete, C., (2004). Ultrastructure and histochemical study on gills and skin of the Senegal sole Solea senegalensis. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 20:452-460.

[32] Vigliano, F.A., Aleman, N., Quiroga, M.I., and Nieto, J.M., (2006). Ultrastructural characterization of gills in juveniles of the Argentinian Silverside, Odontesthes bonariensis (Valenciennes, 1835) (Teleostei:Atheriniformes). Anatomia Histologia Embryologia-Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series C, 35:76–83.

[33] Carmona, R., Garcia Gallego, M., Sanz, A., Domezain, A., and Ostos Garrido, M.V., (2004). Chloride cells and pavement cells in gill epithelia of Acipenser naccarii: ultrastructural modifications in seawater-acclimated specimens. Journal of Fish Biology, 64:553-566.

[34] Pfeiffer C.J., Smith B.J., and Smith S.A., (1999). Ultrastructural morphology of the gill of the hybrid striped bass (Morone saxatilis X M. chrysops). Anatomia Histologia Embryologia, 28:337-344.

[35] Çınar, K., Şenol, N., Özen, and M.R., (2008). Histochemical characterization of glycoproteins in the gills of the carp (Cyprinus carpio). Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 55:61-64.

[36] Köprücü, S., Karaman, Z. ve Yüngül, M., (2014). Avrupa Yayın Balığı (Silurus glanis, Linnaeus, 1758)’nın Solungaçlarında Bazı Histokimyasal Özelliklerin İncelenmesi. İstanbul Üniversitesi Su Ürünleri Dergisi 29(1):73-85.

[37] Kapoor, B.G., (1957). Sectory cells in gills of Indian fresh water spiny eel, Mastacembalus armatus (Lacep). Japanese Journal of Ichthyology, 5(3-6):123-126.

[38] Calabro, C., Albanese, M.P., Lauriano, E.R., Martella, S., and Licata, A., (2005). Morphological, histochemical and immunohistochemical study of the gill epithelium in the abyssal teleost fish Coelorhynchus coelorhynchus. Folia Histochemica Et Cytobiologica, 43:51-56.

[39] Zaccone, G., (1981). Effect of osmotic stress on the chloride and mucous cells in the gill epithelium of the freshwater teleost Barbus filamentosus (Cypriniformes, Pisces). A structural and histochemical study. Acta Histochemica, 68:147-159.

[40] Timur, G., (2013). Balık Histolojisi ve Embriyolojisi. Sertifika No: 120-128. Başakşehir/İstanbul.

[41] Shane, D.R. and Powell, M.D., (2003). Comparative ionic flux and gill mucous cell histochemistry: effects of salinitiy and disease status in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular and Integrative Physiology, 134(3):525-537.

[42] Zayed, A.E. and Mohamed, S.A., (2004). Morphological study on the gills of two species of fresh water fishes: Oreochromis niloticus and Clarias gariepinus. Annals of Anatomy, 186:295-304.

[43] Sarasquete, C., Gisbert, E., Riberio, L., Vieira, L., and Dinis, M.T., (2001). Glycoconjugates in epidermal, branchial and digestive mucous cells and gatric glands of gilthead seabream, Sparus aurata, Senegal sole, Solea senegalensis and Siberian sturgeon, Acipenser baeri development. Europan Journal Histochemistry, 45:267-278.

[44] Diler, D. ve Çınar, K., (2009). Kangal Balıklarının (Gara rufa) Solungaçlarındaki Mukus Hücrelerinin Histokimyası Üzerine Çalışma. Erzincan Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2(1):51-60